Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession /
In this paper we compare two ways of expressing possession in the Indo-Aryan language Urdu. While the genitive case marker can be analyzed as a clitic in a relatively straightforward way, the ezafe construction poses a challenge when it comes to its classification as either a phrasal affix or clitic...
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Amsterdam ; Philadelphia :
John Benjamins Pub. Co.,
2012.
|
| Series: | Linguistik aktuell ;
Bd. 199. |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | CONNECT |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | mig00005325101 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 120913s2012 ne ad ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 005 | 20240613142633.2 | ||
| 010 | |z 2012035401 | ||
| 019 | |a 826856128 |a 827243159 |a 860471043 |a 961672518 |a 962587964 |a 974765041 |a 974854532 |a 1018057003 |a 1043623805 |a 1057671902 |a 1058447011 |a 1086938772 |a 1153517433 |a 1162220987 |a 1241915027 |a 1290058117 |a 1300551841 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789027273000 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9027273006 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9027255822 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789027255822 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781283970846 | ||
| 020 | |a 1283970848 | ||
| 020 | |z 9789027255822 |q (alk. paper) | ||
| 035 | |a 1WRLDSHRocn828739892 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)828739892 |z (OCoLC)826856128 |z (OCoLC)827243159 |z (OCoLC)860471043 |z (OCoLC)961672518 |z (OCoLC)962587964 |z (OCoLC)974765041 |z (OCoLC)974854532 |z (OCoLC)1018057003 |z (OCoLC)1043623805 |z (OCoLC)1057671902 |z (OCoLC)1058447011 |z (OCoLC)1086938772 |z (OCoLC)1153517433 |z (OCoLC)1162220987 |z (OCoLC)1241915027 |z (OCoLC)1290058117 |z (OCoLC)1300551841 | ||
| 037 | |a 428334 |b MIL | ||
| 040 | |a E7B |b eng |e pn |c E7B |d OCLCO |d N$T |d OCLCF |d CDX |d COO |d OCLCQ |d MHW |d EBLCP |d YDXCP |d IDEBK |d NLE |d OCLCQ |d LOA |d AZK |d COCUF |d AGLDB |d MOR |d PIFAG |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d ZCU |d U3W |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d NRAMU |d CRU |d OCLCQ |d REC |d AU@ |d OCLCQ |d DKC |d OCLCQ |d U3G |d M8D |d UKCRE |d VLY |d AJS |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SXB | ||
| 049 | |a TXMM | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a P299.P67 |b M67 2012eb | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 415 |2 23 |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession / |c edited by Kersti Börjars, David Denison, Alan Scott. |
| 260 | |a Amsterdam ; |a Philadelphia : |b John Benjamins Pub. Co., |c 2012. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xii, 341 pages) : |b illustrations | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a data file |2 rda | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, |x 0166-0829 ; |v v. 199 | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper we compare two ways of expressing possession in the Indo-Aryan language Urdu. While the genitive case marker can be analyzed as a clitic in a relatively straightforward way, the ezafe construction poses a challenge when it comes to its classification as either a phrasal affix or clitic. Samvelian (2007) analyzes Persian ezafe as a phrasal affix that is generated within the morphological component, rejecting a postlexical analysis. After taking a look at the data for both constructions, we challenge Samvelian's view of ezafe and explore the possibilities for t. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction*; Dealing with postmodified possessors in early English; 1.1 Introduction; 1.1.1 The corpora; 1.2 Old English; 1.2.1 Split genitives in Old English; 1.2.1.1 Extraposed material in the genitive case; 1.2.1.2 Extraposed prepositional phrases; 1.2.1.3 Extraposed relative clauses; 1.2.1.4 Summary of split genitives in Old English; 1.3 The beginnings of the group genitive; 1.3.1 Changes in Middle English; 1.3.2 Separated genitives. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1.4 Split and group genitives in Middle and Early Modern English1.4.1 Split genitives with prepositions; 1.4.2 Group genitives; 1.4.3 Marking; 1.4.3.1 Split genitives; 1.4.3.2 Group genitives; 1.4.3.3 Possessive phrases without heads; 1.4.4 Marking: Summary; 1.5 Split vs. group; 1.5.1 Prepositions and thematic roles; 1.5.2 Complexity of the possessor phrase; 1.6 Conclusion; Variation in the form and function of the possessive morpheme in Late Middle and Early Modern English; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 The material; 2.3 Typical use of the possessive construction; 2.4 Morpho-syntactic structures. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2.5 Possessor types2.6 The possessive morpheme marker; 2.7 Placement of the possessive morpheme; 2.8 Conclusion; appendices; appendix a.; appendix b: sources ; LETTERS; Letter collections used:; HISTORY; SERMONS; The great regression; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 The history of genitive variation in English: an overview ; 3.3 Data; 3.4 The variable context; 3.5 Genitive frequencies over time: An overview ; 3.6 Conditioning factors ; 3.6.1 Semantics: Genitive relation; 3.6.2 Semantics: Possessor animacy; 3.6.3 Processing: Possessor length and possessum length. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3.6.5 Information status: Possessor givenness3.6.6 Text linguistics: Possessor thematicity; 3.6.7 Text linguistics: Lexical density; 3.6.8 Language-internal conditioning factors: Interim summary ; 3.7 Environmental factors: On the impact of changing input frequencies ; 3.7.1 Model fitting and model simplification ; 3.7.2 Model evaluation and model discussion ; 3.7.3 Environmental factors: Interim summary ; 3.8 Changing genitive grammars ; 3.8.1 Model fitting and model simplification ; 3.8.2 Model evaluation and model discussion ; 3.8.3 Changing genitive grammars: Interim summary. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3.9 Discussion and conclusion Nominal categories and the expression of possession; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 The broader context; 4.3 A corpus study of the English possessive alternation; 4.3.1 What factors drive the alternation?; 4.3.2 Finding the envelope of variation; 4.3.3 What should be excluded?; 4.3.4 How were examples coded?; 4.3.4.1 Weight; 4.3.4.2 Animacy; 4.3.4.3 Discourse status; 4.3.5 Initial results and a confound; 4.3.5.1 Initial results; 4.3.5.2 A conundrum regarding the confound; 4.3.5.3 Interpreting regression results; 4.4 The Monolexemic possessor construction. | |
| 546 | |a English. | ||
| 500 | |a EBSCO eBook Academic Comprehensive Collection North America |5 TMurS | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Grammar, Comparative and general |x Possessives. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Grammar, Comparative and general |x Morphosyntax. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Börjars, Kersti. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Denison, David, |d 1950- |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJc3KxVbP3VM8FcvPGqqQq | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scott, Alan |q (Alan K.) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjJ84VwFvbj6DQfb9YmV3P | |
| 730 | 0 | |a WORLDSHARE SUB RECORDS | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFB9P4TMkRJk6BFCgRbC43 |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9781283970846 |w (DLC) 2012035401 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Linguistik aktuell ; |v Bd. 199. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=525521&authtype=ip,sso&custid=s4672406 |z CONNECT |3 eBooks on EBSCOhost |t 0 |
| 907 | |a 4595707 |b 05-25-21 |c 06-30-20 | ||
| 949 | |a ho0 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b TXM | ||
| 998 | |a wi |d z | ||
| 999 | f | f | |s 27edafd8-80f5-4b7b-9578-000a46c1214d |i 7f3bd0b5-d646-49ca-8a14-f812c12b176f |t 0 |
| 952 | f | f | |a Middle Tennessee State University |b Main |c James E. Walker Library |d Electronic Resources |t 0 |e P299.P67 M67 2012eb |h Library of Congress classification |
