Media concentration and democracy : why ownership matters /

Firmly rooting its argument in democratic and economic theory, the book argues that a more democratic distribution of communicative power within the public sphere and a structure that provides safeguards against abuse of media power provide two of three primary arguments for ownership dispersal. It...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baker, C. Edwin (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Series:Communication, society and politics.
Subjects:
Online Access:CONNECT

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000008i 4500
001 mig00005059708
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020624.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 141103s2007||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 |a 9780511810992 (ebook) 
020 |z 9780521868327 (hardback) 
020 |z 9780521687881 (paperback) 
035 0 0 |a ocm00000001camebacr9780511810992 
040 |a UkCbUP  |b eng  |e rda  |c UkCbUP 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 0 0 |a P96.E252  |b U6257 2007 
082 0 0 |a 302.230973  |2 22 
099 |a Electronic book 
100 1 |a Baker, C. Edwin,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Media concentration and democracy :  |b why ownership matters /  |c C. Edwin Baker. 
246 3 |a Media Concentration & Democracy 
264 1 |a Cambridge :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2007. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xiii, 256 pages) :  |b digital, PDF file(s). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Communication, society and politics 
500 |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 
520 |a Firmly rooting its argument in democratic and economic theory, the book argues that a more democratic distribution of communicative power within the public sphere and a structure that provides safeguards against abuse of media power provide two of three primary arguments for ownership dispersal. It also shows that dispersal is likely to result in more owners who will reasonably pursue socially valuable journalistic or creative objectives rather than a socially dysfunctional focus on the 'bottom line'. The middle chapters answer those agents, including the Federal Communication Commission, who favor 'deregulation' and who argue that existing or foreseeable ownership concentration is not a problem. The final chapter evaluates the constitutionality and desirability of various policy responses to concentration, including strict limits on media mergers. 
650 0 |a Mass media  |x Ownership  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Freedom of the press  |z United States. 
730 0 |a Cambridge EBA Collection 
776 0 8 |i Print version:   |z 9780521868327 
830 0 |a Communication, society and politics. 
856 4 0 |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810992  |z CONNECT  |t 0 
907 |a 3898411  |b 08-25-20  |c 03-18-19 
998 |a wi  |b 08-25-20  |c m  |d z   |e -  |f eng  |g enk  |h 0  |i 2 
999 f f |i dcc1e0ee-2489-4c96-924e-f89a8645a5e2  |s 604ee60f-b076-45e1-9c93-a6fcbb368b0c  |t 0 
952 f f |a Middle Tennessee State University  |b Main  |c James E. Walker Library  |d Electronic Resources  |t 0  |e P96.E252 U6257 2007  |h Library of Congress classification 
856 4 0 |t 0  |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810992  |z CONNECT