New public governance as a hybrid : a critical interpretation /
This Element focuses on New Public Governance as one of the major administrative narratives of our times. It offers a critical interpretation of NPG as a hybrid tool for management, governance, and reform, arguing that NPG coexists with and is likely to gradually merge into New Public Management. Se...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2024.
|
Series: | Cambridge elements. Elements in public and nonprofit administration,
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | CONNECT |
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | in00006451931 | ||
006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
008 | 230305s2024||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d | ||
005 | 20240306153113.1 | ||
020 | |a 9781009418904 (ebook) | ||
020 | |z 9781009454032 (hardback) | ||
020 | |z 9781009418928 (paperback) | ||
035 | |a 1CAMEBACR9781009418904 | ||
040 | |a UkCbUP |b eng |e rda |c UkCbUP | ||
050 | 4 | |a JF1351 |b .C38 2024 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 351 |2 23 |
100 | 1 | |a Cataldi, Laura, |d 1979- |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a New public governance as a hybrid : |b a critical interpretation / |c Laura Cataldi. |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2024. | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (62 pages) : |b digital, PDF file(s). | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Cambridge elements. Elements in public and nonprofit administration, |x 2515-4303 | |
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 26 Jan 2024). | ||
520 | |a This Element focuses on New Public Governance as one of the major administrative narratives of our times. It offers a critical interpretation of NPG as a hybrid tool for management, governance, and reform, arguing that NPG coexists with and is likely to gradually merge into New Public Management. Several arguments support the 'continuity and hybridization' hypothesis, whereby the transition from NPM to NPG occurred through the retention of key elements and a layering and sedimentation process. These arguments challenge the "linear substitution" hypothesis, accounting for NPM's persistence and dominance. The Element develops a new interpretation of NPG and discusses the challenges that NPG poses. Finally, it shows that exploring hybridity is critical for evaluating the potential of NPG in terms of a shift in public administration and understanding governance trajectories and reform scenarios. | ||
650 | 0 | |a Public administration. | |
730 | 0 | |a Cambridge EBA Collection | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9781009454032 |
830 | 0 | |a Cambridge elements. |p Elements in public and nonprofit administration, |x 2515-4303. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009418904 |z CONNECT |3 Cambridge University Press |t 0 |
949 | |a ho0 | ||
998 | |a wi |d z | ||
999 | f | f | |s 1833fb63-ec5d-4c79-ae4c-454d301cf7c6 |i 166ce9d0-d5ac-48bf-b7c6-4d04e01e7ddc |t 0 |
952 | f | f | |a Middle Tennessee State University |b Main |c James E. Walker Library |d Electronic Resources |t 0 |e JF1351 .C38 2024 |h Library of Congress classification |