Similar Items

• What Obergefell v. Hodges should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's same-sex marriage decision /
  by: Balkin, J. M., et al.
  Published: (2020)
• What Obergefell v. Hodges should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's same-sex marriage decision /
  by: Balkin, J. M., et al.
  Published: (2020)
• In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents ; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor, in her capacity as executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, and bipartisan legal advisory group of the United States House of Representatives, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuit : brief of amici curiae Family Equality Council [and 5 others] in support of respondents, addressing the merits and supporting affirmance /
  by: Keating, Katherine
  Published: (2013)
• In the Supreme Court of the United States, United States of America, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor, in her capacity as executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al., respondents : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit : brief of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, Change to Win, and the National Education Association as amici curiae supporting respondent Edith Schlain Windsor and suggesting affirmance /
  by: Berner, Nicole G.
  Published: (2013)
• No. 12-307 in the Supreme Court of the United States : United States of America, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, respondents : brief of Gary J. Gates as amicus curiae on the merits in support of respondent Windsor.
  by: Gates, Gary J.
  Published: (2013)